Discover more from Christian Americanism, by Dave Landry
From whom do we seek guidance?
Why are so few Americans alarmed by Alinskyite arguments? Are we afraid to consider the source? Who is the source of Alinsky’s motives, and objectives? Did he not proclaim his inspiration, and are not the source of his tactics revealed in their origin? If the source is evil, isn’t it clear that the tactics are also evil?
Upon what ultimate source did Saul David Alinsky draw his “wisdom?” Who did Alinsky acknowledge as his inspiration in the dedications of, “Rules For Radicals?” It was Rabbi Hillel, Thomas Paine, and Lucifer.
Alinsky wrote; “Lest we forget at least a over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins- or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom-Lucifer.” Saul Alinsky
It seems that whenever anyone recognizes Alinsky tactics, and points them out, they are ridiculed, and it is suggested that they are making baseless, and irrational attacks upon the subject of their criticism. Might we wonder why this is the case? Did not Alinsky, himself, proudly proclaim that he revered the tactics of Lucifer? Should it not therefore be clear that these tactics are devilish?
I believe that there is an even clearer evidence of the dishonest objectives encompassed in the use of Alinsky tactics, and in this defense of their use. The main thrust of Alinsky tactics is to use deception in order to compel the object of the tactic to compromise, and assist the Alinskyite in the conquest of themself.
There are thirteen “rules for radicals,” and these rules are often used in groups, adding a synergy to their effectiveness. Ignoring the tactics, their devilish nature and objectives only increases our helplessness against these devilish attacks. To be clear, no devilish tactic has ever been used against the unsuspecting for charitable purposes. The reason anyone would choose to enact devilish tactics against their opponent is to overcome, and victimize them, to one extent or another.
This is not the first time that I’ve written about Alinsky, and his “rules for radicals.” I have previously been ridiculed for these references, even by people that I have great affection for. They feel that it is their Christian duty, and an act of love for them to point out my, “folly.” They seem compelled to help me to understand that to recognize these devilish tactics, and point them out is to engage in the promotion of, “conspiracy theories.”
This attitude requires a person to ignore the actual words that Alinsky published, and the reasons that he proposed as his inspiration, and their intended results. It also requires an intentional choice to ignore the “rules” themself. The purpose of each “rule for radicals” is encompassed within the rule itself. I believe that it is impossible to know, and understand the rule, without also understanding its devilish nature, and origin.
I believe that these rules were first used in the Garden of Eden, in Chapter three of the book of Genesis, (in the Bible.)
Jen Psaki, Biden’s out-going press secretary, is the personification of Alinsky’s rules for radicals. For all of her hubris, and dishonesty, she executed her job with confidence and fervor. She never entertained an honest question, regardless of the questioner, or the severity, or importance of the issue. She answered quickly, (as though she was completely prepared,) and she used every applicable rule for radicals possible, (gaslighting those that she wanted to deceive.)
It doesn’t take much to see through her lies, it just takes the desire to know the truth. Joe Biden rarely says anything that is not a lie, but his incompetence is so obvious that even those that want to be deceived have trouble choking them down.
You may wonder why I am so concerned about Alinsky, and his rules. It is because I believe that not all Alinskyites have made the conscious choice to adhere to rules for radicals. Most of those who engage in, or further the reach of those who do, do so ignorantly.
How can this be so, (you might ask?) How many of us know where our teachers learned what they taught us? How many of them knew where their teachers learned what they taught them, etc. and etc?
Hilary Clinton, (no doubt, a paragon of virtue,) introduced Saul Alinsky to Wellesley College, (see Dinesh DeSouza’s “Hilary’s America.)
Once he was given access to academia, his “work” gained an incredible audience among those becoming teachers. It stands to reason that these rules might find themselves hiding in the cracks of the system of education. These rules for radicals became a part of every part of educational instruction, and gradually gained deeper, and deeper access to the foundations of the world of education. These rules, as tactics have become thought of as beyond reproach by many who have suffered from public education, and especially, “higher education.”
Because of these facts, and the fact that non-college educated people often can not conceive that such evil, and despotic attacks might have been perpetrated against the whole of American society, these facts often go unrecognized.
Those that love their fellow man, and don’t want to think evil of others, resist entertaining the idea that there are those that want to deceive, and plunder us all. They do so to their own peril.
I believe that every American should be prolific in their knowledge of scripture, and to the extent that they are aware of the devil, and his plan to destroy us all, and they should know, and understand Saul Alinsky’s, “Rules For Radicals.”
If we know the truth, (The Bible,) and the thirteen, “Rules For Radicals,” we can recognize deceivers when they attempt to deceive us. We can be well equipped to resist the devil, that he might flee from us.
Other posts relating to, “Rules For Radicals.”
God bless you, Dave