I have been witnessing debates over Covid, masks, “vaccines” lockdowns, and social distancing, over the past couple of years. Some are sure that we should listen to the
“experts,” and some are skeptical of those same “experts.”
There have been reports, whistle blowing, and exposes, but what are we to make of them?
I think that we would be wise to seriously consider who we should trust. Anyone can tell us anything, and anyone can also gather credentials. I am not nearly as concerned about what has been said about those that want to inform us, as I am about what they have invested in, and said that they intend to bring to pass.
You may wonder what am I talking about.
Ever since our society was attacked by the Covid 19 “virus,” we have been trained to trust in certain experts. We have then been offered an experimental “vaccine” with claims of over 90% effectiveness at stopping the spread, and death.
The actual record of these pharmaceuticals is far less effective at achieving these claims. If that were not bad enough, we are being pressured to accept these “vaccine” anyway.
If that were not bad enough, Covid has from early on proven not to be a danger to youth, yet there is enormous pressure to vaccinate children. I can’t help but wonder why?
If these factors didn’t raise my skepticism high enough, there are the issue of just who are behind the production of these “vaccines,” and endorsement of them.
Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab are among those that promote these gene therapies.
These two men are also both very concerned about reducing “carbon,” and reducing population. I have heard audio of Bill Gates lecturing that we need to get carbon to zero. Do you realize that every living mammal exhales carbon dioxide, and always will?
If we take Bill Gates at his word, and our goal, (according to him,) is to reduce carbon to zero, there will need to be zero mammals alive.
Don’t get mad at me, I didn’t say it, he did. Words have meaning, and he is either a blithering idiot, or he knows exactly what he said, and what it would mean.
All of the members of the World Economic Forum claim to believe in this plan to severely reduce the world’s population, if not eliminate it.
So if these people want to eliminate humans, don’t you find it suspicious that they are involved in the development, and distribution of these “vaccines” that are claimed to, “save people’s lives?
If that were not suspicious enough, what does it mean that more people are dying of complications from “Covid vaccines” than covid?
I don’t know, does that make sense to you? Is it possible that these vaccines were not intended to save lives, rather to end them? Wouldn’t that be far better aligned with a plan to reduce population than with a plan to increase the number of people to recover from deadly diseases?
Facts are facts, and I don’t think it is wise to ignore them.
God bless you, Dave