Are the American people paying attention? Can we expect to ignore it when powerful people tell us that multi-billions of people need to be eliminated to reach “sustainability,” or “net zero?”
There are only two ways to eliminate billions of people, they can either not be allowed to be born, or they must be murdered.
While it is certainly possible for huge natural catastrophes to kill people, 6 to 7 billion is a stretch.
Many of those who congregate at the World Economic Forum are not slack to pontificate on the need to reach net zero carbon.
I realize I am not the first to mention that when they refer to carbon they are referring to CO2, or carbon dioxide.
While it is common for people to mention it, and while it used to be common knowledge that carbon dioxide is not only not a pollutant, it is essential. Without it, plants die. Not some plants, but all plants. All trees, all grass, all lettuce, all tomatoes, all flowers, including roses.
As you picture how drab this would be, let me add another twist, plant life is either the sole, primary, or partial food source for every living animal on earth.
I am not writing this article because no one else is, but because I have a particularly simple mind. I don’t get caught up in the critical details of issues, or occurrences. They are above my pay grade.
I look at things at a foundational level. Often people are too intelligent to bother themselves at this level. Their intellectual curiosity urges them to meditate on the intricacies, often enabling nefarious actors to exploit their gullibility.
When the “experts,” those with higher education and lofty credentials, urgently warn of impending doom, they are compelled to consider the points as presented.
I, on the other hand, cannot follow these craftily constructed fables, my mind goes straight to their plausibility according to a biblical wisdom.
What does “net zero” mean? Does it mean that carbon dioxide is to be eliminated? That would mean the death of everything, EVERY THING! Clearly, these “geniuses” are not suggesting their own demise.
Does it mean only enough carbon dioxide to sustain that which is important?
If so, who is it that will determine what, or more importantly, who is important enough that the rest of God’s creation must be sacrificed to accommodate them?
Davos, the World Economic Forum is cluttered with people like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, and Yuval Noah Harari.
These people are arrogant enough to state plainly on public recordings that this is their intention. They leave off the part where you are supposed to have everything you care about destroyed and die. They discuss it as a purely clinical matter.
There are currently over 7 billion people on the earth, they claim that our world is capable of supporting only 1 to 2 billion, so “this number must be reduced by 6 billion.”
Professor Dennis Meadows clarified this in the attached video.
“How the Population Must be reduced to 1-2 billion, Achieved by Epidemics”
Klaus Schwab, Yuval Noah Harari, and Bill Gates have often proposed such a “fix.”
Normal Americans and Christians, always wanting to avoid being “too judgmental,” often refuse to believe they really mean what they say, but they often speak it right out, loudly saying that billions of people must cease to exist.
In the attached video, the title of Professor Meadows’ interview implies that this reduction of population might be achieved through epidemics or an epidemic.
When will my fellow Christians begin to pay attention? Are we to turn our cheeks till everything and everyone we love is eliminated?
Believe me, these dark force characters are chomping at the bit to “make it so.”
God bless you, Dave
“All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” __Edmund Burke
If you enjoy my articles, please share them with your friends.