SO DISAPPOINTED
I thought for a minute that I finally found someone willing to discuss inflation
For years I have been hearing people discuss this vital subject void of any detectable connection to reality.
It first dawned on me that inflation is a result of separating our currency from gold backing after reading a pamphlet circulated by the Libertarian Party. Not much else proposed by this party rings true to me, but this one subject jumped off the page for me.
Having a growing knowledge of the Word of God, and living in the real world, I understood that work produces fruit, and that fruit is called wealth.
Money is a tradable medium for easier exchange of that wealth. It just that simple.
We must wonder why economics seems so difficult, and why managing our economy must be left to people of such high intelligence. Why is it so hard for so many to understand the formulas, and figures used in explaining our economy’s ins and outs?
I believe that there is but one reason, and I have been writing about it for many years.
The reason is simple, modern monetary theory is simple. Very intelligent, yet dishonest, and perverse people don’t want to use their mental talents in applications that produce goods and services for others. They would rather use those same talents and abilities to defraud others of the wealth that they produced.
The only way that this fraud can continue unfettered is by adamantly pretending that something else is going on. Much like a shell game, the pea is always where it is, and if the challenger is able to keep track of it, they will win the game. However, the presenter of the challenge tries to get their opponent to take their eye off of it. If the deception is successful, the challenger will lose.
Many books have been written by intelligent people describing the field of economics in which the main purpose of the writing is to further the fraud of modern monetary theory.
“Modern monetary theory,” I keep using that word, do you think I know what it means? (I know, it is actually a phrase, but I wanted to reference “The Princess Bride.”
This is a new term, as far as I know. I heard it for the first time on the Glenn Beck Show a couple of years ago in reference to (a new monetary concept,) but I realize that it is just that name is new. It is being attached to a deceptive scheme that has been perpetrated on the American economy for decades.
Who knows for sure when, and where it began as a concept, but its inablement began in the year 1913 when the Federal Reserve Act was passed.
I recently wrote an article named, “I HAVE QUESTIONS FOR SOMEONE SMART.” My goal was and is to find someone willing and able to discuss this vital subject with. I’m beginning to think there is no one honest enough to address this subject with me.
Someone named Len Kender commented on it, and I thought I had finally found someone to bounce ideas with to help illustrate this incredibly important fraud to my readers.
Well, it didn’t pan out quite like I had hoped. If you’re interested, you can read our exchanges in the comments following, “I HAVE QUESTIONS FOR SOMEONE SMART.”
Whether Len knows it or not, Len tried to use Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals to distract me from the truth, so that I would become confused, and succumb to a farce.
I tried repeatedly to persuade Len to stick to facts and principles, but I was unsuccessful.
In Len’s latest comment, the response was in part,
I don't want to take time now to try to analyze and understand all of the material you're giving, but I'll take a little time to briefly discuss this quote from you above: "I never implied that government spending caused inflation. It is the creation of money out of thin air that 'is' inflation because it devalues all American currency in circulation at the time it is added.”
According to Harris, which seems correct to me, money isn't physical. It's abstract, or mental, I guess. It's similar to points on a scoreboard, or piece of paper, etc. where points are recorded.
Federal spending is how money is created. I guess the currency is where the points are recorded. Since Congress sets the value of the dollar, or is Constitutionally assigned that job, if I recall correctly, then it doesn't seem to me that printing the currency would have an effect on the value of individual dollars.
As you can see, Len refused to consider facts, mathematical realities, or historical records. Len continues to promote the opinions of others that may or may not have any validity or basis in fact.
Recently a Supreme Court nominee used similar tactics to avoid being found unsuitable for the Court. She demonstrated that she is eminently unqualified to sit on the Court by refusing to define what a woman is.
You may ask how refusing to answer demonstrated that she is unqualified. She was testifying under oath at the time, and she had been nominated according to Joe Biden’s proclamation that he would nominate, “a woman of color.”
The fact that she is a woman is demonstrated by her nomination, and she knows this because she had been informed, and likely had heard it repeated ofttimes in the media, yet she claimed not to be able to define what a woman is.
Therefore, she either was too stupid to recognize these facts, or she was lying while under oath in a court preceding.
50 US Senators and the Vice President voted to seat her on the Supreme Court, where she will pass judgments of vital importance for most of her remaining years.
I cite this to demonstrate the stakes in these brushes with Alinsky tactics. It matters not to me whether someone knows that they are using Alinsky rules, if we ignore the rules, we will likely fall prey.
I write this article not to criticize Len, but to use this occurrence as a teachable moment, (a phrase that the great Rush Limbaugh made famous.)
I bear no animus toward Len, but I am serious about the economic hell that lies ahead if America continues on its present course. Those in control of our financial system have marked our nation for destruction and are intent on “looting the treasury on the way out,” as Jesse Kelly has been saying.
God bless you, Dave
“Duty is ours, results are God’s” John Quincy Adams